View Count: 112 |  Publish Date: August 31, 2013
Housing fix has strong enemies

One way to judge the virtues of the city of Richmonds initiative to use eminent domain to help its strapped mortgage borrowers is by the hysterical reaction of the banks and investors holding the mortgage loans.
Wells Fargo & Co. and Bank of New York have sued the East Bay city in federal court to throttle the plan even before its birth. (A court hearing on their request for an injunction is set for Sept. 13.)
Theyve enlisted federal regulators in their hand-wringing over the damage little Richmond (pop. 105,000) might wreak on the mortgage market nationwide. The real estate interests have even cajoled some of their housebroken congressmen, such as John Campbell (R-Irvine), into introducing legislation to stop Richmond in its tracks. Michael Hiltzik E-mail | Recent columns Also Homeownership remains a goal that should be encouraged The perils of online college learning Cable monopolies hurt consumers and the nation Maps Richmond, CA, USA
So there must be something to the citys idea.
A lot of flapdoodle has been pumped into the public consciousness about Richmonds plans, most of it from the financial sector. It says Richmond is planning to seize underwater mortgages from lenders by condemning them by eminent domain for low-ball prices. It says theres no precedent for using eminent domain for the citys stated purpose of arresting blight — its just for building things like schoolhouses and highway onramps. This is all about the misuse of public power for private benefit, to quote Bank of New Yorks lawsuit.
But thats not quite true. Its really all about the failure of the federal government and the banking industry to bring desperately needed mortgage relief to homeowners wrecked on the shoals of the housing crash — many of them steered onto the rocks by unscrupulous mortgage bankers.
The governments major program for mortgage relief, the Home Affordable Modification Program, has served only 20% to 25% of the 5 million homeowners it was designed to assist. Richmond is stepping into a genuine vacuum.
Its also about arresting a slide in Richmonds economy. I want to stabilize our neighborhoods, says Patrick Lynch, the citys housing director. I know what a blighted property costs us to board it up and send the fire department out on calls.
You may think Richmonds effort is outdated. After all, home values are rising again and the foreclosure wave is ebbing. Thats true generally, but the trend has passed Richmond by. In the city, which is 40%Latinoand 25% black, more than half the homeowners are still underwater — their homes are worth less than they owe on their mortgages — by an average of 45%.
Richmonds goal is to bring some financial relief to those homeowners. Theyre prime candidates for relief, because the deeper underwater a loan is, the greater the chance that it will end up in default and then foreclosure.
Its well understood in the housing industry that the most effective way of staving off these defaults is to cut the principal due on the loans to a figure bearing some rational relationship to the homes value.
The toughest mortgages to work out, according to Richmond officials and their financial advisors, are those held in securitized pools, which can be owned by hundreds of thousands of investors; banks that service those pools tend to be uncertain about their legal authority to modify those mortgages unless theyre right on the verge of foreclosure, so they tend not to be proactive.
So Richmonds City Council voted to offer banks servicing mortgage pools a deal: The city would buy underwater mortgages. Then, with the help of the San Francisco investment firm Mortgage Resolution Partners, the mortgages would be extinguished and refinanced so their balances would come to about 95% of the homes current market value, on average. Theyd no longer be underwater, and the risk of default would be much lower.
The targeted loans should meet two criteria, according to Robert Hockett, a Cornell University law professor who originated the idea of backing up mortgage refinancings with eminent domain. They should be loans so deeply underwater theyre at high risk of default, so their value can actually be increased by writing down the principal balances, he told me. Second, they should be loans that are hard to write down voluntarily, because of the questions about the loan servicers authority to do so.
The citys eminent domain power plays a dual role in this initiative. First, its a threat: If the banks refused to deal with the city, the mortgages could be seized. But its also a tool: It removes all legal doubt about the banks authority to sell or modify the loans; they would be required to do it.
Richmond started the ball rolling July 31 by making an offer to Wells Fargo and other servicing banks for 624 loans with unpaid balances totaling about $242 million. More than two-thirds had the oddball features that made for toxic loans during the housing crash — adjustable rates, negative amortization, interest-only payments.
The citys offer came to $126.5 million, or a little over 52% of the unpaid balances. The prices being offered for these loans are wildly low-ball numbers, points and points and points below fair value in this market, says Daniel Ivascyn, head of the mortgage portfolio team at the Newport Beach investment firm PIMCO, which owns some of the mortgage pools at issue and is pressing for the injunction. That said, the mortgages sought by the city average out at 37% underwater. Thats a level at which the risk of default is high, even if theyre not yet delinquent.
Here are some important points: The city made clear these were opening bids — it invited the banks to counter if for any reason you are not satisfied with this offer. Second, a true low-ball offer wouldnt survive the eminent domain process, because under state law, the owner of seized property can demand a reappraisal from a court. Third, the city hasnt actually started any eminent domain proceedings — that will require a separate vote by the City Council. In other words, the banks have gone to court to stop a program that doesnt actually exist yet.
The mortgage industry has responded to Richmond with all the fatuous flimflam you would expect from a gang that has never owned up to its responsibility for the housing disaster.
In a declaration filed with the Wells Fargo lawsuit, Mortgage Bankers Assn. Chief Executive David Stevens characterizes the typical mortgage contract as a homeowners unconditional promise to repay the loan in full, regardless of the future value of the house or any other set of circumstances. His point is that using eminent domain interferes with this sacred relationship.
Copyright © 2013, Los Angeles Times 1 2 next | single page Comments0 Comments (0)Add comments | Discussion FAQ
Currently there are no comments. Be the first to comment!

 banks   city   domain   eminent   eminent domain   loan   loans   mdash   mortgage   mortgages   owner   Richmond   underwater   using 

Picture Keywords
 banks   city   domain   eminent   eminent domain   loan   loans   mdash   mortgage   mortgages   owner   Richmond   underwater   using 
Time: 3:25  |  News Code: 327406  |  Site: L. A. Times
Collecting News by Parset Crawler
Know more about Parset crawler