View Count: 177 |  Publish Date: November 13, 2013
Apple demands $380M in patent trial, but Samsung wants to pay $52M

Outside US District Court in San Jose, Calif., the scene of the Apple v. Samsung trial.(Credit:Josh Lowensohn/CNET) SAN JOSE, Calif. -- An Apple attorney told a jury on Wednesday that the company wants an additional $380 million in damages from Samsungs patent infringement. Thats on top of the $600 million Samsung already has to pay after a judge vacated about $450 million of the original award.
Samsung, meanwhile, said it should only have to pay Apple $52 million.
Apple attorney Harold McElhinny and Samsung attorney Bill Price made the comments during opening statements here at a retrial in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. A new jury of eight people has been assembled to determine how much more Samsung owes Apple for infringing on five patents related to the iPhones design and functionality.
We will hear a lot from Samsung, saying no one would have purchased Apple products, McElhinny said. But in its heart, Samsung knew it was a two-horse race.
He pointed to an internal Samsung document as conclusive evidence Apple lost sales because of Samsung.
Apple v. Samsung redux: What you need to know (FAQ)
Samsungs Price, meanwhile, said Apple is asking for more money than its entitled to.
He noted that customers didnt just buy Samsung products for bounce-back screens and other features that infringed on Apple patents. Rather, they also sought out bigger screens, removable batteries, 4G LTE service, and other items.
McElhinny arrived at the $380 million amount based on lost profits of about $114 million, Samsungs profits of about $231 million, and reasonable royalties of approximately $35 million. Apple estimates it would have sold 360,000 devices if Samsung hadnt released infringing rivals. He noted that Samsung sold 10.7 million infringing devices, generating $3.5 billion in revenue.
In a fair fight, that money should have gone to Apple, McElhinny said.
The retrial related to damages kicked off Tuesday with jury selection. Its slated to last about six days before the case is turned over to the jury -- composed of six women and two men -- for deliberation.
Judge Lucy Koh on Tuesday asked Apple and Samsung to again hold settlement talks before another trial slated for March. The parties agreed to submit a proposal by January 8.
Related stories:Judge to Apple, Samsung: Give peace one more chanceJury awards Apple more than $1B, finds Samsung infringedApple v. Samsung: Judge orders new trial on some damagesApple: Judge was off by $85M in cutting Samsung damages Apple originally filed suit against Samsung in April of 2011, accusing the Korean company of copying the look and feel of its products. Samsung countersued two months later over patent infringement and said it was at work on touch-screen phones with giant rectangular screens and rounded corners well before Apple showed up. The initial trial, which stretched more than three weeks in August of 2012, wrapped both of those cases in one, somehow squeezing together the patent infringement issues, alongside antitrust claims, and even trade dress issues.
In August of last year, a nine-person jury sided with Apple on a majority of its patent infringement claims against Samsung. At that time, the jury awarded Apple $1.05 billion in damages, much less than the $2.75 billion sought by the Cupertino, Calif., electronics giant. Samsung, which asked for $421 million in its countersuit, didnt get anything.
However, Koh in March ordered a new trial to recalculate some of the damages in the case, striking $450.5 million off the original judgment against Samsung. What that means is Samsung is still on the hook for about $600 million in damages, but a new jury has to decide how much else it owes.
The products in question include the Galaxy Prevail, Gem, Indulge, Infuse 4G, Galaxy SII AT&T, Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Exhibit 4G, Galaxy Tab, Nexus S 4G, Replenish, and Transform. The Prevail in particular racked up $57.9 million of the damages tally, which Koh said was a failure on the jurys part, since the device was found to infringe only on utility patents, and not on design patents.
McElhinny spent a little less than an hour Wednesday morning outlining the ways Samsung infringed on Apple products and that it did so intentionally. He noted that the case is about one question - how much Samsung owes Apple for infringing its patents. McElhinny also called Samsung Apples star witness, saying internal documents will show the company set out to copy the iPhone when designing its new smartphones.
The company that broke the law took in $3.5 billion, McElhinny said. At the end of this case, you will decide how much of that $3.5 billion Samsung should rightfully return to Apple for the damage it has done to us.
Samsung products involved in rethink of damages (pictures) 1-2 of 14Scroll LeftScroll RightUpdated at 10:50 a.m. PTwith information about Samsungs proposal.

 Apple   Calif   case   company   damage   damages   how much   infringe   infringement   infringing   judge   jury   McElhinny   much   patent   patent infringement   patents   products   Samsung   Samsungs   screen   trial 

Picture Keywords
 Apple   Calif   case   company   damage   damages   how much   infringe   infringement   infringing   judge   jury   McElhinny   much   patent   patent infringement   patents   products   Samsung   Samsungs   screen   trial 
Time: 20:40  |  News Code: 338560  |  Site: CNET
Collecting News by Parset Crawler
Know more about Parset crawler