View Count: 172 |  Publish Date: December 25, 2012
Corporate tax rate overhaul may be part of a 'fiscal cliff' deal

WASHINGTON — Amid the wrangling over the so-called fiscal cliff, President Obama and congressional Republicans can agree on something: They want to lower the corporate tax rate.
The U.S. has the highest overall rate of any of the worlds developed economies. It took the top spot in March after Japan reduced its rate, mimicking other countries that have lowered taxes to lure new businesses and keep existing companies from leaving.
Negotiations to avert automatic income tax increases and federal spending cuts scheduled to kick in Jan. 1 could provide the impetus for U.S. policymakers to tackle an overhaul of the corporate tax code next year.
The White House wants to put a corporate tax overhaul, along with changes to the individual income tax system, on a fast track as part of any deal to avoid the fiscal cliff.
The centerpiece of an overhaul would be slashing the 35% corporate tax rate, a goal long sought by corporate executives and lobbyists.
Quiz: How much do you know about the fiscal cliff?
In the name of global competitiveness, I think that has largely been agreed to, Jim McNerney, chief executive of Boeing Co., said about how both parties view the need for major corporate tax changes.
In February, Obama proposed lowering the federal rate to 25% for manufacturing companies and to 28% for other firms. Rep. Dave Camp (R-Mich.), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, has been pushing a plan to lower the rate to 25% for all corporations.
In both cases, the rate cuts would be accompanied by the elimination of some of the numerous tax breaks that allow many companies to pay a much lower effective tax rate — and sometimes to avoid paying any corporate taxes at all.
The administrations position on this is very much in sync with what Republicans say they want, which is a lower rate and a broader base, said Jared Bernstein, a senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and the former chief economist for Vice President Joe Biden.
But there still are some obstacles to a deal.
Some Democrats want to use an overhaul to increase the amount of tax revenue coming from corporations, while Republicans want to keep the amount the same. The White House and congressional Republicans also differ on how the U.S. should treat money earned abroad.
And the business community itself is divided. Many small companies file taxes as individuals. Theyre opposed to any fiscal cliff deal that would raise their rates while giving corporations a rate reduction.
Analysts said the obstacles could be overcome because there is consensus around the broader point that the U.S. needs to bring its corporate tax rate in line with other developed nations.
Regardless of your political persuasion, it is unquestionably the case that the nominal U.S. corporate tax rate is much higher than that of peer countries, said Edward Kleinbard, a USC law professor and former chief of staff of Congress Joint Committee on Taxation.
The case for corporate tax reform got a boost when the overall U.S. rate of 39.1%, which includes federal, state and local corporate taxes, became the highest this year among the 34 nations in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Two decades ago, the U.S. was 13th.
At one time in the 80s, we had a competitive corporate tax rate, said Dorothy Coleman, vice president of tax and domestic economic policy for the National Assn. of Manufacturers. Weve fallen behind by standing still.
Quiz: The year in business
But the rate in the tax code isnt what many companies pay because of a host of deductions and tax credits. In 2011, the effective corporate tax rate in the U.S. was 29.2%, roughly in line with the 31.9% average of the six other largest developed economies, the Obama administration said.
The White House said that parity does not mean the statutory rate shouldnt be reduced. It simply means that many tax breaks should be eliminated, allowing the rate to be lowered without adding to the deficit.
Copyright © 2012, Los Angeles Times 1 2 next | single page Comments0 Comments (0)Add comments | Discussion FAQ
Currently there are no comments. Be the first to comment!

Time: 14:19  |  News Code: 42039  |  Site: L. A. Times
Related News:
Collecting News by Parset Crawler
Know more about Parset crawler